PDA

View Full Version : CNN Uses Holograms



edg3
06-11-2008, 02:56 PM
http://img.labnol.org/di/jessicayellin.jpg

http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-1443_2422025,00.html

New York - CNN viewers saw double on Tuesday when the cable news giant used a hologram to "beam up" a reporter from Chicago to New York for election analysis. How did they do it?

Like a character out of the science fiction movie Star Wars, veteran political anchor Wolf Blitzer used a 3D hologram system to transport correspondent Jessica Yellin into his studio.

Yellin, a little fuzzy and appearing to glow, conducted a brief discussion with Blitzer before vanishing again.

"You're a terrific hologram," Blitzer told the image.

Yellin explained to viewers that her body was actually still in Chicago, with 35 cameras filming her inside a special tent.

"They shoot my body at different angles and I'm told that's what transmits my entire body image back to New York," she said.

"It's like I follow the tradition of Princess Leia," she said, referring to the Star Wars heroine.

Underneath - for what CNN said was the first time in television history - the screen announced: "Jessica Yellin via hologram from Chicago. Live."

They chose to unveil the technology in the midst of CNN's wall-to-wall coverage of the historic US election on Tuesday pitting underdog Republican John McCain against Democrat Barack Obama, who is bidding to become the nation's first African-American president.


http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/10/06/holographic.television/index.html

The reason for renewed optimism in three-dimensional technology is a breakthrough in rewritable and erasable holographic systems made earlier this year by researchers at the University of Arizona.

Dr Nasser Peyghambarian, chair of photonics and lasers at the university's Optical Sciences department, told CNN that scientists have broken a barrier by making the first updatable three-dimensional displays with memory.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081106/ap_en_tv/tv_cnn_s_hologram

The hologram left some critics baffled. "It was a cute trick," wrote Tom Shales in The Washington Post, "but how did it substantially contribute to the coverage? No one seemed to know."


So, any thought as to whether this is real or not? Also, what does it mean for us as gamers?

I really dont see people being able to afford this in their homes, so will it only ever be accessible when watching news etc?

SkinnersBox
06-11-2008, 03:07 PM
Save me Wolf Blitzer, you’re my only hope.

Watched it live due to the cnn hype, It was pretty lame IMO

(Wolf couldn't see the image on stage, only viewers on their screens)

shewman
06-11-2008, 03:10 PM
I heard about this on the radio this morning so I gather it is true.
The technology will probably improve over the next few years and then who knows what will happen. It will probably be in peoples homes in the future (replacing the telephone handset) but that will probably be a long time from now.

dammit
06-11-2008, 03:29 PM
What an awesome surname. And neat trick too...I love living in the future :D

R33KO
06-11-2008, 03:46 PM
That. Is. 100% win! :P

dislekcia
06-11-2008, 04:04 PM
That. Is. 100% Bullcrap!

It's not a hologram if it's just the appropriate 2D image from the "right" angle overlayed on the outgoing image from the studio... What a bunch of random marketing hype for no real reason.

SkinnersBox
06-11-2008, 04:17 PM
CNNPWNT (http://www.engadget.com/tag/hologram/)

Real hologram (http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=cN9u1xl-VME)

MOAR (http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=25007)\

If you think of a Hologram as an illusion, than CNN made an illusion of an illusion.

onona
06-11-2008, 04:28 PM
That's not a hologram, just a bluescreen trick. Big ****ing whoop.

Kharrak
06-11-2008, 04:30 PM
Erm... yeah. That's not a real hologram :/
(its kinda obvious... >_>)

Wesley
06-11-2008, 04:33 PM
But thats not a true hologram! If it was, then Blitzer would have been able to see Yellin on stage.

Meh, there is a real one that beams an image just like the one in Star Wars, but it uses crystals and light refraction technology, and only shows up in black and white. I'll look for the article a little later...

Tr00jg
06-11-2008, 05:31 PM
I laughed my ass off when it came on TV. It was so ridiculous!

It's not even a proper hologram. >_<

cr@zydude
06-11-2008, 05:43 PM
I think it was a cool trick, but didn't really add anything to the broadcast.

edg3
06-11-2008, 06:27 PM
I think it was a cool trick, but didn't really add anything to the broadcast.

The hologram left some critics baffled. "It was a cute trick," wrote Tom Shales in The Washington Post, "but how did it substantially contribute to the coverage? No one seemed to know."

Im seeing double.

dislekcia
06-11-2008, 06:29 PM
I think it was a cool trick, but didn't really add anything to the broadcast.

It wasn't a cool trick, it was a lame lie. They could have done the same thing 10 years ago.

Sven
06-11-2008, 06:50 PM
Meh, there is a real one that beams an image just like the one in Star Wars, but it uses crystals and light refraction technology, and only shows up in black and white. I'll look for the article a little later...


It wasn't a cool trick, it was a lame lie. They could have done the same thing 10 years ago.

Didn't the British build the first prototype? One of their universities...?

dislekcia
06-11-2008, 06:56 PM
Didn't the British build the first prototype? One of their universities...?

First prototype what? Blue screen and then replace chroma values? I dunno, the caveman that first did it may have been british... Or, at least, on what would eventually become part of the british isles due to continental drift.

Wesley
06-11-2008, 07:14 PM
Yeahi it was a team of Brits, a French and a Russian dude if I remember correctly. I found the info again, it was in the official Star Wars fact file that was sold through CNA years ago.

dislekcia
06-11-2008, 07:20 PM
Yeahi it was a team of Brits, a French and a Russian dude if I remember correctly. I found the info again, it was in the official Star Wars fact file that was sold through CNA years ago.

Ok. Just checking here, but you do realise that what they did on CNN was not that same method right?

Bluescreen with lots of cameras does not equal a hologram.

wir
06-11-2008, 07:31 PM
Bluescreen with lots of cameras does not equal a hologram.
Good God, someone should sue the person that let them label it as a "hologram".

Look! Antigravity, well, actually there are strings holding me up. But still! Antigravity!

dislekcia
06-11-2008, 07:39 PM
Good God, someone should sue the person that let them label it as a "hologram".

Look! Antigravity, well, actually there are strings holding me up. But still! Antigravity!

Technically, strings holding you up do allow you to circumvent gravity. So that would be less of a lie than the lolograms...

wir
06-11-2008, 07:50 PM
*Look! Teleportation! Well, actually we just make a copy elsewhere. But still! Teleportation!

Garson007
06-11-2008, 07:56 PM
Technically, strings holding you up do allow you to circumvent gravity. So that would be less of a lie than the lolograms...
Gravity is a conservative force, even when you are standing on solid ground you are most certainly not circumventing it... You can however work against it with another force. In this case with ropes.