LARRABEE: Game over for graphics cards?

[G8crasha]

Game over for graphics cards?
How Intel's Larrabee GPU tears up the rulebook

Sunday at 11:45 BST | Tell us what you think [ 1 comments ]
gaming

Larrabee promises better gaming graphics without a third-party card

Spare a thought for AMD and NVIDIA. They have been happily smacking each other upside the head for a decade. But at least they have been doing so safe in the knowledge that their GPUs are distinct from ? and inherently superior in graphics processing terms ? to CPUs.

At least, that used to be the case. Intel has now unveiled Larrabee, a co-processor based on an entirely new approach to graphics processing. If Intel has done its sums correctly, not only will the very definition of the GPU be unceremoniously defenestrated, but also AMD and NVIDIA's graphics chips could even be pummelled to the very brink of existence.

If that sounds like hubris, try this for size. Larrabee could also tear up the rulebook for CPUs, too. That's right, a single new architecture might just take over as ultimate all-round processor, eventually cannibalising sales of Intel's own conventional CPUs.

What exactly is this deathly destroyer, this harbinger of doom made manifest in 45nm silicon? Some sort of retro-engineered alien technology? Well, here's the really hilarious bit. In simple terms, it's just a metric crapload of old Pentium MMX processors crammed into a single processor die and mounted on a PCI Express board much like any other graphics card.

Exactly how many of these cores Larrabee contains Intel will as yet not be drawn on. Given that chips based on the Larrabee architecture won't go on sale until late next year or early in 2010, it's entirely possible Intel has yet to finalise the core count.

Watching the clock cycles

However, we do know that the Pentium-derived design of the cores makes them much smaller than those found in an Intel Core 2 die. In fact, Intel suggests 10 Larrabee cores can fit in the same space as a single 65nm Core 2 Duo die. Extrapolate out from that using the knowledge that Larrabee will be based on 45nm silicon technology and we reckon Larrabee chips will boast at least 32 cores at launch.

Other than the Pentium link, the other major feature of the Larrabee core architecture is a superwide floating point unit. Capable of handling 16 instructions per clock cycle, it's four times as wide as the equivalent unit in one of Intel's existing desktop CPUs. Factor in each core's additional ability to support four software threads and the chip's potential is truly staggering. It's just possible that Larrabee might deliver 100 times the floating-point punch of a Core 2 Duo chip.

Impressive as that sounds, what we don't know is how good this battery of general purpose and x86-compatible cores will actually be for graphics processing. Sure, it will be much more programmable than any graphics chip before. But that doesn't mean it will be fast. Roll on 2009.

STORY

[dammit]

I'll be interested in this when its commercially available

[CrashHelmut]

The article is a bit sensationalist:

If Intel has done its sums correctly, not only will the very definition of the GPU be unceremoniously defenestrated, but also AMD and NVIDIA's graphics chips could even be pummelled to the very brink of existence.

If that sounds like hubris, try this for size. Larrabee could also tear up the rulebook for CPUs, too. That's right, a single new architecture might just take over as ultimate all-round processor, eventually cannibalising sales of Intel's own conventional CPUs.

Another major player in the discrete GPU market can probably only be a good thing for the consumer. But NVIDIA and ATI have had years of experience with this type of technology.

I wonder how effective a number of general purpose CISC cores (Pentium MMX) will be for graphic processing as opposed to a built for purpose GPU. Still, this different approach might just pay off.

I also get the feeling that a lot of the media coverage underestimates the software (firmware and drivers) aspect of GPU performance.

[Chevron]

That's the thing. By the time it gets released ati/nvidia will have yet another range of cards out.

Also intels card is more built for raytracing than Directx/opengl how it will far is unknown. One thing that is known is that they better have one hell of a driver team.

Intel have already said that the guys working on their intergrated gfx drivers won't be working Larrabbee. That is a very good thing.

[DXeXodus]

Nvidia and ATI won't let this capsize them. They are most probably capable of creating cards much more powerful than they currently are, but up until now have had no need to and rather just milk the market slowly.